Hi
I have downloaded SP1, and am trying to display an image by URL.
I have followed the steps described in the SP1Readme. However i am still unable to view my image in the "Preview" mode in report designer and also through report server. When i right click to view the source of my webpage, the image src is empty like this <img class="R1" src="http://pics.10026.com/?src=">.
Any idea, what can be wrong? This is what i did:
1) set in designer Source=External
2) set Value=http://localhost/Webmodule/test.img
3) image immediately showed up
4) Go to "Preview" mode in designer, image shows a red cross
5) ran rsconfig -e -m mycomputer -s mycomputer -u user1 -p password
6) deploy .rdl onto report server
7) image still shows a red cross
8) when view source, it shows <img class="R1" src="http://pics.10026.com/?src=">
I have set my datasource credentials to "credentials stored securely on report server" and provided the username and password in the report manager.
chiara.IMG is an unsupported image format. Supported are bmp, jpeg, gif, png, and
x-png.
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Chiara" <Chiara@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:40B9C60C-320F-47B9-857F-D7DFFD4EE4A6@.microsoft.com...
> Hi
> I have downloaded SP1, and am trying to display an image by URL.
> I have followed the steps described in the SP1Readme. However i am still
unable to view my image in the "Preview" mode in report designer and also
through report server. When i right click to view the source of my webpage,
the image src is empty like this <img class="R1" src="http://pics.10026.com/?src=">.
> Any idea, what can be wrong? This is what i did:
> 1) set in designer Source=External
> 2) set Value=http://localhost/Webmodule/test.img
> 3) image immediately showed up
> 4) Go to "Preview" mode in designer, image shows a red cross
> 5) ran rsconfig -e -m mycomputer -s mycomputer -u user1 -p password
> 6) deploy .rdl onto report server
> 7) image still shows a red cross
> 8) when view source, it shows <img class="R1" src="http://pics.10026.com/?src=">
> I have set my datasource credentials to "credentials stored securely on
report server" and provided the username and password in the report manager.
>
> chiara
>
>sql
Showing posts with label unable. Show all posts
Showing posts with label unable. Show all posts
Monday, March 26, 2012
Friday, March 23, 2012
Extent Fragmentation
I am currently trying to defrag a table and am unable to
reduce Extent fragmentation.
The structure of the table is as follows.
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] (
[PortfolioID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[ID] [int] NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] WITH NOCHECK ADD
CONSTRAINT [PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER] PRIMARY KEY
CLUSTERED
(
[PortfolioID],
[ID]
) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] ADD
CONSTRAINT [AK_IDPFOL_PORTFOLI] UNIQUE
NONCLUSTERED
(
[ID],
[PortfolioID]
) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE INDEX [PortfolioMember_FK] ON [dbo].
[PortfolioMember]([ID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE INDEX [has_members_FK] ON [dbo].[PortfolioMember]
([PortfolioID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] ADD
CONSTRAINT [FK_PORTFOLI_RELATION__PORTFOLI]
FOREIGN KEY
(
[PortfolioID]
) REFERENCES [dbo].[Portfolio] (
[PortfolioID]
)
GO
So it has a clustered index.
The Best I can get from DBCC SHOWCONTIG (PortfolioMember)
DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'PortfolioMember' table...
Table: 'PortfolioMember' (1429580131); index ID: 1,
database ID: 7
TABLE level scan performed.
- Pages Scanned........................: 26048
- Extents Scanned.......................: 3277
- Extent Switches.......................: 3283
- Avg. Pages per Extent..................: 7.9
- Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count]......: 99.15%
[3256:3284]
- Logical Scan Fragmentation ..............: 0.03%
- Extent Scan Fragmentation ...............: 90.51%
- Avg. Bytes Free per Page................: 802.9
- Avg. Page Density (full)................: 90.08%
DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages,
contact your system administrator.
I have tried the following all with no success at
reducing Extent fragmentation:
DBCC DBREINDEX (portfoliomember, '', 90)
DBCC DBREINDEX (portfoliomember, 'PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER', 90)
DBCC INDEXDEFRAG (CRS_BaseDev, portfoliomember,
PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER)
I have executed sp_spaceused and there is plenty of room.
I am currently rebuilding the table but don't want to
have to do this to properly defrag the table.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
Jamie
jamie.downs@.risk.sungard.comJamie,
A couple of questions first. Is this the entire table? I assume it has
more columns but were left out for simplicity sake. If so it is usually
best to shoe the actual DDL so there are no assumptions. If [ID] is unique
then why not just make it the PK and drop the PortfolofioID? Why do you
create duplicate indexes? You have a PK constraint and a Unique constraint
on the two columns. This will make an index already to enforce the
constraint. There is no need to add a second index to each one. The last
comment is that I assume you have multiple files in your file group and that
is what is giving you the Extent fragmentation. This value is basically
useless when you have multiple files.
--
Andrew J. Kelly
SQL Server MVP
"Jamie" <jamie.downs@.risk.sungard.com> wrote in message
news:0ee801c393e8$463c0460$a301280a@.phx.gbl...
> I am currently trying to defrag a table and am unable to
> reduce Extent fragmentation.
> The structure of the table is as follows.
> CREATE TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] (
> [PortfolioID] [int] NOT NULL ,
> [ID] [int] NOT NULL
> ) ON [PRIMARY]
> GO
> ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] WITH NOCHECK ADD
> CONSTRAINT [PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER] PRIMARY KEY
> CLUSTERED
> (
> [PortfolioID],
> [ID]
> ) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> GO
> ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] ADD
> CONSTRAINT [AK_IDPFOL_PORTFOLI] UNIQUE
> NONCLUSTERED
> (
> [ID],
> [PortfolioID]
> ) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> GO
> CREATE INDEX [PortfolioMember_FK] ON [dbo].
> [PortfolioMember]([ID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> GO
> CREATE INDEX [has_members_FK] ON [dbo].[PortfolioMember]
> ([PortfolioID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> GO
> ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] ADD
> CONSTRAINT [FK_PORTFOLI_RELATION__PORTFOLI]
> FOREIGN KEY
> (
> [PortfolioID]
> ) REFERENCES [dbo].[Portfolio] (
> [PortfolioID]
> )
> GO
> So it has a clustered index.
> The Best I can get from DBCC SHOWCONTIG (PortfolioMember)
> DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'PortfolioMember' table...
> Table: 'PortfolioMember' (1429580131); index ID: 1,
> database ID: 7
> TABLE level scan performed.
> - Pages Scanned........................: 26048
> - Extents Scanned.......................: 3277
> - Extent Switches.......................: 3283
> - Avg. Pages per Extent..................: 7.9
> - Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count]......: 99.15%
> [3256:3284]
> - Logical Scan Fragmentation ..............: 0.03%
> - Extent Scan Fragmentation ...............: 90.51%
> - Avg. Bytes Free per Page................: 802.9
> - Avg. Page Density (full)................: 90.08%
> DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages,
> contact your system administrator.
> I have tried the following all with no success at
> reducing Extent fragmentation:
> DBCC DBREINDEX (portfoliomember, '', 90)
> DBCC DBREINDEX (portfoliomember, 'PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER', 90)
> DBCC INDEXDEFRAG (CRS_BaseDev, portfoliomember,
> PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER)
> I have executed sp_spaceused and there is plenty of room.
> I am currently rebuilding the table but don't want to
> have to do this to properly defrag the table.
> Does anyone have any suggestions?
> Thanks in advance.
> Jamie
> jamie.downs@.risk.sungard.com
>
>|||As a follow-on to what Andrew said, the extent fragmentation algorithm
inside DBCC SHOWCONTIG specifically does not work when an index/table spans
multiple files and this is stated in BooksOnLine.
You should read the whitepaper on fragmentation and how-to/whether-to
address it at:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechnol/sql/maintain/optimize/ss2kidbp.asp
Regards,
Paul.
--
Paul Randal
DBCC Technical Lead, Microsoft SQL Server Storage Engine
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@.shadhawk.com> wrote in message
news:O$44jy$kDHA.684@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Jamie,
> A couple of questions first. Is this the entire table? I assume it has
> more columns but were left out for simplicity sake. If so it is usually
> best to shoe the actual DDL so there are no assumptions. If [ID] is
unique
> then why not just make it the PK and drop the PortfolofioID? Why do you
> create duplicate indexes? You have a PK constraint and a Unique
constraint
> on the two columns. This will make an index already to enforce the
> constraint. There is no need to add a second index to each one. The last
> comment is that I assume you have multiple files in your file group and
that
> is what is giving you the Extent fragmentation. This value is basically
> useless when you have multiple files.
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly
> SQL Server MVP
>
> "Jamie" <jamie.downs@.risk.sungard.com> wrote in message
> news:0ee801c393e8$463c0460$a301280a@.phx.gbl...
> > I am currently trying to defrag a table and am unable to
> > reduce Extent fragmentation.
> >
> > The structure of the table is as follows.
> >
> > CREATE TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] (
> > [PortfolioID] [int] NOT NULL ,
> > [ID] [int] NOT NULL
> > ) ON [PRIMARY]
> > GO
> >
> > ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] WITH NOCHECK ADD
> > CONSTRAINT [PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER] PRIMARY KEY
> > CLUSTERED
> > (
> > [PortfolioID],
> > [ID]
> > ) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> > GO
> >
> > ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] ADD
> > CONSTRAINT [AK_IDPFOL_PORTFOLI] UNIQUE
> > NONCLUSTERED
> > (
> > [ID],
> > [PortfolioID]
> > ) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> > GO
> >
> > CREATE INDEX [PortfolioMember_FK] ON [dbo].
> > [PortfolioMember]([ID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> > GO
> >
> > CREATE INDEX [has_members_FK] ON [dbo].[PortfolioMember]
> > ([PortfolioID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> > GO
> >
> > ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] ADD
> > CONSTRAINT [FK_PORTFOLI_RELATION__PORTFOLI]
> > FOREIGN KEY
> > (
> > [PortfolioID]
> > ) REFERENCES [dbo].[Portfolio] (
> > [PortfolioID]
> > )
> > GO
> >
> > So it has a clustered index.
> >
> > The Best I can get from DBCC SHOWCONTIG (PortfolioMember)
> >
> > DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'PortfolioMember' table...
> > Table: 'PortfolioMember' (1429580131); index ID: 1,
> > database ID: 7
> > TABLE level scan performed.
> > - Pages Scanned........................: 26048
> > - Extents Scanned.......................: 3277
> > - Extent Switches.......................: 3283
> > - Avg. Pages per Extent..................: 7.9
> > - Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count]......: 99.15%
> > [3256:3284]
> > - Logical Scan Fragmentation ..............: 0.03%
> > - Extent Scan Fragmentation ...............: 90.51%
> > - Avg. Bytes Free per Page................: 802.9
> > - Avg. Page Density (full)................: 90.08%
> > DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages,
> > contact your system administrator.
> >
> > I have tried the following all with no success at
> > reducing Extent fragmentation:
> >
> > DBCC DBREINDEX (portfoliomember, '', 90)
> >
> > DBCC DBREINDEX (portfoliomember, 'PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER', 90)
> >
> > DBCC INDEXDEFRAG (CRS_BaseDev, portfoliomember,
> > PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER)
> >
> > I have executed sp_spaceused and there is plenty of room.
> >
> > I am currently rebuilding the table but don't want to
> > have to do this to properly defrag the table.
> >
> > Does anyone have any suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Jamie
> > jamie.downs@.risk.sungard.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>sql
reduce Extent fragmentation.
The structure of the table is as follows.
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] (
[PortfolioID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[ID] [int] NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] WITH NOCHECK ADD
CONSTRAINT [PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER] PRIMARY KEY
CLUSTERED
(
[PortfolioID],
[ID]
) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] ADD
CONSTRAINT [AK_IDPFOL_PORTFOLI] UNIQUE
NONCLUSTERED
(
[ID],
[PortfolioID]
) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE INDEX [PortfolioMember_FK] ON [dbo].
[PortfolioMember]([ID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE INDEX [has_members_FK] ON [dbo].[PortfolioMember]
([PortfolioID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] ADD
CONSTRAINT [FK_PORTFOLI_RELATION__PORTFOLI]
FOREIGN KEY
(
[PortfolioID]
) REFERENCES [dbo].[Portfolio] (
[PortfolioID]
)
GO
So it has a clustered index.
The Best I can get from DBCC SHOWCONTIG (PortfolioMember)
DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'PortfolioMember' table...
Table: 'PortfolioMember' (1429580131); index ID: 1,
database ID: 7
TABLE level scan performed.
- Pages Scanned........................: 26048
- Extents Scanned.......................: 3277
- Extent Switches.......................: 3283
- Avg. Pages per Extent..................: 7.9
- Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count]......: 99.15%
[3256:3284]
- Logical Scan Fragmentation ..............: 0.03%
- Extent Scan Fragmentation ...............: 90.51%
- Avg. Bytes Free per Page................: 802.9
- Avg. Page Density (full)................: 90.08%
DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages,
contact your system administrator.
I have tried the following all with no success at
reducing Extent fragmentation:
DBCC DBREINDEX (portfoliomember, '', 90)
DBCC DBREINDEX (portfoliomember, 'PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER', 90)
DBCC INDEXDEFRAG (CRS_BaseDev, portfoliomember,
PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER)
I have executed sp_spaceused and there is plenty of room.
I am currently rebuilding the table but don't want to
have to do this to properly defrag the table.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
Jamie
jamie.downs@.risk.sungard.comJamie,
A couple of questions first. Is this the entire table? I assume it has
more columns but were left out for simplicity sake. If so it is usually
best to shoe the actual DDL so there are no assumptions. If [ID] is unique
then why not just make it the PK and drop the PortfolofioID? Why do you
create duplicate indexes? You have a PK constraint and a Unique constraint
on the two columns. This will make an index already to enforce the
constraint. There is no need to add a second index to each one. The last
comment is that I assume you have multiple files in your file group and that
is what is giving you the Extent fragmentation. This value is basically
useless when you have multiple files.
--
Andrew J. Kelly
SQL Server MVP
"Jamie" <jamie.downs@.risk.sungard.com> wrote in message
news:0ee801c393e8$463c0460$a301280a@.phx.gbl...
> I am currently trying to defrag a table and am unable to
> reduce Extent fragmentation.
> The structure of the table is as follows.
> CREATE TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] (
> [PortfolioID] [int] NOT NULL ,
> [ID] [int] NOT NULL
> ) ON [PRIMARY]
> GO
> ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] WITH NOCHECK ADD
> CONSTRAINT [PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER] PRIMARY KEY
> CLUSTERED
> (
> [PortfolioID],
> [ID]
> ) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> GO
> ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] ADD
> CONSTRAINT [AK_IDPFOL_PORTFOLI] UNIQUE
> NONCLUSTERED
> (
> [ID],
> [PortfolioID]
> ) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> GO
> CREATE INDEX [PortfolioMember_FK] ON [dbo].
> [PortfolioMember]([ID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> GO
> CREATE INDEX [has_members_FK] ON [dbo].[PortfolioMember]
> ([PortfolioID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> GO
> ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] ADD
> CONSTRAINT [FK_PORTFOLI_RELATION__PORTFOLI]
> FOREIGN KEY
> (
> [PortfolioID]
> ) REFERENCES [dbo].[Portfolio] (
> [PortfolioID]
> )
> GO
> So it has a clustered index.
> The Best I can get from DBCC SHOWCONTIG (PortfolioMember)
> DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'PortfolioMember' table...
> Table: 'PortfolioMember' (1429580131); index ID: 1,
> database ID: 7
> TABLE level scan performed.
> - Pages Scanned........................: 26048
> - Extents Scanned.......................: 3277
> - Extent Switches.......................: 3283
> - Avg. Pages per Extent..................: 7.9
> - Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count]......: 99.15%
> [3256:3284]
> - Logical Scan Fragmentation ..............: 0.03%
> - Extent Scan Fragmentation ...............: 90.51%
> - Avg. Bytes Free per Page................: 802.9
> - Avg. Page Density (full)................: 90.08%
> DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages,
> contact your system administrator.
> I have tried the following all with no success at
> reducing Extent fragmentation:
> DBCC DBREINDEX (portfoliomember, '', 90)
> DBCC DBREINDEX (portfoliomember, 'PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER', 90)
> DBCC INDEXDEFRAG (CRS_BaseDev, portfoliomember,
> PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER)
> I have executed sp_spaceused and there is plenty of room.
> I am currently rebuilding the table but don't want to
> have to do this to properly defrag the table.
> Does anyone have any suggestions?
> Thanks in advance.
> Jamie
> jamie.downs@.risk.sungard.com
>
>|||As a follow-on to what Andrew said, the extent fragmentation algorithm
inside DBCC SHOWCONTIG specifically does not work when an index/table spans
multiple files and this is stated in BooksOnLine.
You should read the whitepaper on fragmentation and how-to/whether-to
address it at:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechnol/sql/maintain/optimize/ss2kidbp.asp
Regards,
Paul.
--
Paul Randal
DBCC Technical Lead, Microsoft SQL Server Storage Engine
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@.shadhawk.com> wrote in message
news:O$44jy$kDHA.684@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Jamie,
> A couple of questions first. Is this the entire table? I assume it has
> more columns but were left out for simplicity sake. If so it is usually
> best to shoe the actual DDL so there are no assumptions. If [ID] is
unique
> then why not just make it the PK and drop the PortfolofioID? Why do you
> create duplicate indexes? You have a PK constraint and a Unique
constraint
> on the two columns. This will make an index already to enforce the
> constraint. There is no need to add a second index to each one. The last
> comment is that I assume you have multiple files in your file group and
that
> is what is giving you the Extent fragmentation. This value is basically
> useless when you have multiple files.
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly
> SQL Server MVP
>
> "Jamie" <jamie.downs@.risk.sungard.com> wrote in message
> news:0ee801c393e8$463c0460$a301280a@.phx.gbl...
> > I am currently trying to defrag a table and am unable to
> > reduce Extent fragmentation.
> >
> > The structure of the table is as follows.
> >
> > CREATE TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] (
> > [PortfolioID] [int] NOT NULL ,
> > [ID] [int] NOT NULL
> > ) ON [PRIMARY]
> > GO
> >
> > ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] WITH NOCHECK ADD
> > CONSTRAINT [PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER] PRIMARY KEY
> > CLUSTERED
> > (
> > [PortfolioID],
> > [ID]
> > ) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> > GO
> >
> > ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] ADD
> > CONSTRAINT [AK_IDPFOL_PORTFOLI] UNIQUE
> > NONCLUSTERED
> > (
> > [ID],
> > [PortfolioID]
> > ) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> > GO
> >
> > CREATE INDEX [PortfolioMember_FK] ON [dbo].
> > [PortfolioMember]([ID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> > GO
> >
> > CREATE INDEX [has_members_FK] ON [dbo].[PortfolioMember]
> > ([PortfolioID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]
> > GO
> >
> > ALTER TABLE [dbo].[PortfolioMember] ADD
> > CONSTRAINT [FK_PORTFOLI_RELATION__PORTFOLI]
> > FOREIGN KEY
> > (
> > [PortfolioID]
> > ) REFERENCES [dbo].[Portfolio] (
> > [PortfolioID]
> > )
> > GO
> >
> > So it has a clustered index.
> >
> > The Best I can get from DBCC SHOWCONTIG (PortfolioMember)
> >
> > DBCC SHOWCONTIG scanning 'PortfolioMember' table...
> > Table: 'PortfolioMember' (1429580131); index ID: 1,
> > database ID: 7
> > TABLE level scan performed.
> > - Pages Scanned........................: 26048
> > - Extents Scanned.......................: 3277
> > - Extent Switches.......................: 3283
> > - Avg. Pages per Extent..................: 7.9
> > - Scan Density [Best Count:Actual Count]......: 99.15%
> > [3256:3284]
> > - Logical Scan Fragmentation ..............: 0.03%
> > - Extent Scan Fragmentation ...............: 90.51%
> > - Avg. Bytes Free per Page................: 802.9
> > - Avg. Page Density (full)................: 90.08%
> > DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages,
> > contact your system administrator.
> >
> > I have tried the following all with no success at
> > reducing Extent fragmentation:
> >
> > DBCC DBREINDEX (portfoliomember, '', 90)
> >
> > DBCC DBREINDEX (portfoliomember, 'PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER', 90)
> >
> > DBCC INDEXDEFRAG (CRS_BaseDev, portfoliomember,
> > PK_PORTFOLIOMEMBER)
> >
> > I have executed sp_spaceused and there is plenty of room.
> >
> > I am currently rebuilding the table but don't want to
> > have to do this to properly defrag the table.
> >
> > Does anyone have any suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Jamie
> > jamie.downs@.risk.sungard.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>sql
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Exporting to MS Excel
We are unable to maintain the format of our 3 column style report when we
export the report to MS Excel. However, we have no problems with maintaining
the 3 column style report format when exporting to .PDF.
Please help!
However, our business depends on this formatted report for our 2400 members
accessing the membership directory.
Thank you.On Feb 23, 11:09 am, Terry <T...@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> We are unable to maintain the format of our 3 column style report when we
> export the report to MS Excel. However, we have no problems with maintaining
> the 3 column style report format when exporting to .PDF.
> Please help!
> However, our business depends on this formatted report for our 2400 members
> accessing the membership directory.
> Thank you.
Unfortunately, columns are only supported when exported to PDF and
Tiff.
Regards,
Enrique Martinez
Sr. Web/Database Independent Consultant
export the report to MS Excel. However, we have no problems with maintaining
the 3 column style report format when exporting to .PDF.
Please help!
However, our business depends on this formatted report for our 2400 members
accessing the membership directory.
Thank you.On Feb 23, 11:09 am, Terry <T...@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> We are unable to maintain the format of our 3 column style report when we
> export the report to MS Excel. However, we have no problems with maintaining
> the 3 column style report format when exporting to .PDF.
> Please help!
> However, our business depends on this formatted report for our 2400 members
> accessing the membership directory.
> Thank you.
Unfortunately, columns are only supported when exported to PDF and
Tiff.
Regards,
Enrique Martinez
Sr. Web/Database Independent Consultant
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)